Review
Latter Days
Steven Sandvoss, Wes Ramsey. Director: C.Jay Cox
| The usual public preconception of a gay-themed independent film is that of a low budget, poorly shot film that leaves you wondering after the film what it was about. Kinds of films that appeal to the culture buffs, but not much else.
Although never released into the box office, the quality of cinematography and profile of the actors could easily have put it there, if it wasn’t for the controversial subject matter that angered right-wing religious groups around America. Latter Days is about the union of opposites… promiscuously gay (“I can suck the engine block through the tailpipe of a ‘58 Chevy”) Christian, played by Wes Ramsey, gets new neighbours… four Mormon missionaries. The youngest of them, Elder Aaron Davis (played by Steve Sandross), becomes the target of the shallow Christian, who sees it fit to convert a missionary, rather than the other way around. |
 |
 |
The director C.Jay Cox delves into his past to produce a startlingly accurate (apparently) account of life as a Mormon missionary, and the shame and humiliation directed at those seen to be homosexual. In an interview given to DNA Magazine, he clearly states his opinion on gays in the Mormon Church, particularly in light of the recent election. “The majority … believed that President Bush was doing a bad job, but were willing to overlook all that as long as they had a president who believed gay marriage was intolerable”. Like the film “Saved!”, this movie strikes a clear blow at the hypocracy of many organised religions, and especially that of the Mormons. It also gives a discernable poke at the gay stereotype that Christian portrays, i.e. the city party-boy, who’s work colleague remarks “Darling… you don’t have to be deep… you just have to be pretty”. According to Cox, the main characters are portrayals of his two stages in life… that of a closeted Mormon, and that of an out and promiscuous gay man. |
| The film touches on other interesting topics, such as the quest for spirituality, and the notion of fate. Although some of the symbolism was a little far-fetched and laboured in parts, it kept the plot together. For the dough-eyed viewer, the romance is as much uplifting as it is heart-wrenching. Notions of fate, and the transformational powers of love can soften even the cynical. The movie provides a hope for many of its intended audiences, especially those that question their sexuality, and those that search for a truth beyond the superficial. |  |
 |
The casting is absolutely brilliant. Nothing easier to attract an audience than use the most gorgeous actors possible, who intertwine in some of the most sensual and electric ways. The movie was given an “R” rating, not that it would matter much considering the controversial subject would never be aired in a mainstream cinema.
Overall, this movie was very enjoyable, and despite the “interesting” use of symbology in it, I found it an emotive yet upliftingly romantic flick with an obvious political target. It was condemned by the Mormon Church, who actively campaigned to have the film pulled from retail outlets around America. The film left me with an usually teary eye, and a renewed awareness of the hypocracy of the so-called “moral guidelines” set out by religious organisations. |
The film can be found in good DVD retailers, some video rentals stores and online at Amazon. I would seriously recommend it… it is one of the most enjoyable pieces of gay literature or media that I’ve come across in some time.
I loved that movie! Well some parts were cheesey but hey, it’s a campy gay movie.
Oh I know! Watched it with the boy today… very cheesy i’ll agree, but you don’t get enough of that in gay-genre movies I reckon!
Just last night I was looking up pictures of the movie and came across this great site with pics of Steve on it.
Click on the pic link at the bottom to see a great collection.
http://spazicus.com/mark/steve.htm
The first time I saw this movie I was in shocked at how well done and how true to life the story was.
Most of us can relate to so many of the people in this movie.
I have bought and have seen this movie so many times and hope I neve get tired of it. Funny thing is I never have not teared up at the end.
I am so glad you posted your review and hope more people see it and fall in love with it.
Thank you.
B.
I couldn’t find any pics that I particularly wanted, so I yanked the pics straight from the DVD.
I couldn’t help myself during the film’s climax… sooo many corny coincidences / miracles… it just made me get all warm n’ emotional!
I never really get even the slightest bit warm n’fuzzy over most romance novels / movies, probably because they aren’t really relevant to me. This one though.. I could relate so well to it.
I wrote the article as a writing exercise… I’m glad you enjoyed it!
*hugz*
If you get it over there the latest issue of The Advocate has a great cover story on the mormon church. I had to buy it cus my good friend George is in it
No, we don’t have The Advocate, but our local fag rags have likewise printed a few stories on the Mormon Church, after that movie was released…
Oh I own that movie. It was definitely cute :D.
I hope more people see it! It’s kind of fun
I think it’s a lot of fun… I find so many gay-themed movies so depressing, so this one was a welcome change!
It’s a movie I have wanted to see for a while. One of my LJ friends had a Mormon background. And we are almost around the corner from the Australian headquarters of the Mormon Church, so we see many of them around here.
I would really recommend seeing it. It says a lot about the Mormon faith, and about the ways that religion can influence a family’s morals.
The movie touched me unlike most other gay movies. Yes, I must agree, the relevance factor plays a major role. The only other gay indy movie I like would be, “Defying Gravity,” if anyone’s heard of that one.
I do agree, some parts were really cheesy. If only life actually dished out so many convenient coincidences with resilient individuals that will put up with almost anything in a relationship. Still, there was something about the movie that queezed my cardiovascular. The metaphor of the dots on on a newspaper was brilliant.
Coming form a liberal Catholic’s viewpoint, yes it is hard to live the organized religious life, and there is a lot of hypocries. I can’t argue with that, I’m lucky I’m not Mormon I guess. Still, it;s not like the Catholic church is a lot better, but I have been lucky enough to receive positive support from friends within my local church.
Just to add another controversial thought, I haven’t seen any gay domestic productions casting actors who are not the typical “ken doll,” with a 6 pack and all that crap. It’d be refreshing to see other types, black, asian, whatever, play lead roles as well in portraying gay life. The darker, mediterranean Euro look being as far was one would go when thinking of “exotic” is pathetic, not to sat that thinking anyone as “exotic” isn’t. It would make it more real. Any thoughts on that?
LOL!
Arrggghhh.. i’m not sure what iinet is like, but if they don’t offer static IP’s straight up, I wouldn’t be getting my hopes up.
You need a static IP unless you fancy changing your DNS records every time your ISP changed your IP address. ’sfar as I knew… it was easier to issue a static IP rather than the other way around!
It should say somewhere in iinet’s FAQ whether they support servers. Quite a few ISPs block port 25, so that could rule out a webserver.
I posted twice like a nut …please delete second copy.
too early here .